Truth Essay Example For Students

Truth Essay The question of right and wrong has been battled over for centuries. Many conservatives still believe that truth is absolute, while others disagree, saying that truth is relative. I believe that truth is an individuals perception of beliefs and decisions. For that reason, truth differentiates among individuals thorough their contrasting opinions. But, truth is something that everyone believes to be correct. Thus, it greatly depends on whats true in the minds of the people. On the contrary, truth thats spoken with bad intent is considered to be worse than a lie. Hence, truth is an expression, symbol or statement that corresponds to reality and happiness. Truth is dominated by ones subjective thoughts and beliefs. It is a concept thats created by man, and therefore can never have any absolutes. And if a concept such as the truth has no absolutes, it becomes subjective based upon your perceptions of it. However, an individuals experiences, thoughts and beliefs shape their perception of truth. Truth is timeless, abstract and unchanging ideals based on the individual. All truth is subjected to an individuals opinion. We will write a custom essay on Truth specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now It is based on persons perspective on society and developed by their past experiences. Similarly, subjective truth deals with what is in the persons mind. Also could mean the opinion of a person of certain objects. A subjective truth is an idea which may be important to me but not to you. For example, I decide that killing, under any circumstance, is wrong, but you decide that killing to protect yourself is ok. The idea that killing is wrong is upheld by both of us, but your truth and mine are different, subject to our opinions on the idea. Nevertheless, I also consider truth to be absolute, and therefore, it is never right to do wrong. Truth is the purity that differentiates between right and wrong. Absolute Truth is true regardless of what we believe and think. Absolute truth stands on its own. In the sense, absolute truth is absolutely true no matter what evidence there is for it. Truth is what corresponds to the facts. Truth does not change just because we learn something about it. Also, truth is not always good to say. If the objective of telling the truth is to hurt someone, then it is considered to be inferior to a most terrible lie. For that reason, while speaking the truth we should keep in mind that it doesnt hurt someone elses feelings or relations. The problem we face is that, we feel the urge to tell the truth when we see it. But, we should try to accomplish this without disapproving condemnations that hurt others. So when we freely express harsh judgment of another, we are in fact talking about those negative qualities of ourselves that trouble us the most. Likewise, care should be taken that truth thats spoken for self-satisfaction does not impair someone elses life. Similarly, we should always bear in mind that at times lie can also be beneficial to say if, it brings happiness to others. Hence, if the truth is spoken with the purpose of destruction of something or someone then its considered to be more awful then a major lie. With this is mind; we can conclude that truth is a representation of actuality and contentment. Also, rather than truth, the lies have always been more accepted and believed in our world. But, people consider truth that everyone believes to be true. Thus, for that reason, truth is greatly dependent on subjective of ones opinion.

Chapter 9 A.P U.S History Essay Example

Chapter 9 A.P U.S History Essay Example Chapter 9 A.P U.S History Essay Chapter 9 A.P U.S History Essay Chapter 9 Essay Although President Jackson was a champion of democracy and egalitarianism, there are some instances where he takes advantage of his presidential powers and uses him for his own benefits and beliefs and not for the good of the country. President Jackson did a lot of good for the early Democratic Party though. He helped expand voting and focused on destroying monopolies like the national bank that he believed were harming the nation. He did however take manners into his own hands at times. For instance disregarding Supreme Court rulings. Enacting Military action on a state and Vetoing bills like the Maysville road that wouldVe helped the union, but since he didnt approve he vetoed it. President Jackson did a fantastic Job of expanding democracy. In his presidency he expanded the amount of voters from 27% in the election of 1824 to 58% in 1828 and by 1840 80% of adult white males were voting. Jackson thoroughly believed in equal protection and equal benefits, and that is the form of government he wanted. During Jacksons administration he believed in taking owers away from the rich and giving the common man more of it. In the Picture Jackson Tramples on the Constitution he is depicted as a monarchial king who tramples on the constitution and is called King Andrew the First. (Document A). This is because the opposing political party the Whigs wanted to keep power in the hand of the rich to create a more stable form of government and by Jackson vetoing the bill they thought he was abusing his Presidential Powers. Furthermore there were some instances where Jackson did abuse his political powers by blatantly disregarding the Constitution. In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly h the size of Georgia. We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation. (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldnt assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as The Trail of Tears. Furthermore although Jackson had his flaws he was still a great promoter of democracy and preserved the Union. In 1828 when the Tariff of Abomination was put into place the eople of South Carolina felt the tariffs were too high and would destroy their businesses. In response to this tariff The South Carolina Exposition and Protest was written. (Document E). This document said that Tariff acts are unconstitutional and that the State of South Carolina would consider them nullified and not obey them. Jacksons response to this was the Force Act which gave the President a right to use any means necessary to get people to obey the constitution. Although this didnt solve the crisis it showed Jackson wanted to preserve the union over all else. The reduced over 10 years to the old 1816 tariffs which was considered more moderate. In conclusion Jackson was an excellent President who was a champion of democracy and egalitarianism. He expanded political power to the common man and fought against a corporate monopoly which he felt was destroying the Union, the National Bank. Jackson did have his faults though he would override rulings and do what he saw fit. He would veto many bills despite what was right. Jackson had his issues but he was one of the greatest expanders of Democracy in our history.

Public law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

Public law - Essay Example According to Dicey, â€Å"The principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely that Parliament thus defined [i.e., as the ‘King in Parliament’] has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament† (as cited in Eleftheriadis, 2009). Hence, one can say that parliament alone has the power to make laws. It also has the immunity in that none can change the laws made by it. In Jackson v Attorney-General [2005] UK HL 56, Lord Steyns approved an argument put forward in 1935. He said that the monarch and the two Houses (Lords and Commons) must consent to legislate. Parliament can spread legislative powers in various ways. This was redefining parliament for a specific purpose and could not be ignored (Carroll, 2013. P. 105). In Pickin v British Railways Board [1974 ] AC 765, it was noted that though parliament had not followed procedure, it could not be compelled to investigate the allegation. (ibid, p. 102). 1. The EU Referendum Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty of UK â€Å"The constitutional referendum is often conceptualised as the ultimate institutional expression of popular sovereignty’’  (Daly, 2013). ... If no party receives an absolute majority, the future of the referendum could be in jeopardy. Only if the orders are passed through parliamentary assent can the referendum be conducted at the stipulated time. In the past, many amendments were proposed to EU Treaty bills. This resulted in the demand for referendum for such amendments. The Conservatives were of the opinion that the EU was intruding into various aspects of life. Hence, they supported a ‘referendum lock’ which would validate future EU association by the citizens (European Union Referendum Bill, 2013). The EU provided its members an ‘opt-out option’. However, this was cast in an all or nothing terms. This was to discourage UK and such members who took the matter lightly. The Treaty demands that opt-out decision should be taken at least six months prior to the end of the transition period allowed. The Tory Eurosceptics were in favour of no opting back. They were of the opinion that co-operation wi th other European countries could be possible through international arrangements on a case-by-case basis (Craig, 2013, p. 172). Sovereignty is closely related to state power. The state maintains sovereignty in that it has the power and authority to enact laws by which it can serve the national interest. Member states desired international co-operation in foreign & security policy, justice & home affairs. In such sensitive matters, they prefer inter-governmentalism, hence retaining control in their own hands. Nevertheless, EU needs to involve itself since crime and terrorism have a cross-border nature. Hence, state autonomy will have to be sacrificed in such matters as the price for resolving serious issues of global concern. The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is a case in point. EAW